September 22 2025

Dispute over access road: court restores right of way

Our law firm successfully represented clients in a case that, while seemingly unusual, raised a critical issue: a 6-meter-wide access road to a land plot had “disappeared” during cadastral measurements.

The situation was absurd. Just days before the approval of new cadastral data, the National Land Service (NLS) was reviewing our clients’ request to plan an access road. The review was postponed for two weeks, during which the road – although marked in archived plans – was left out of the newly approved cadastral file.

Though the NLS acknowledged the error, they could not correct it without the landowner’s consent. As a result, the owners of a land parcel at the end of the road were formally left without access for over 3 years.

The first-instance court ruled to annul the registration of the road as part of a private parcel and found that the surveyor should have followed original property boundary documents. The appellate court upheld this, confirming that boundaries restored through ownership restitution cannot later be altered via measurements.

Key takeaways for landowners and businesses:

  1. Original boundary records matter. Surveyors must follow archived cadastral sketches and boundary acts.

  2. Double-check your surveyor. Ensure they have all documents. A “more convenient” boundary can later cause legal trouble.

  3. Limited institutional powers. The NLS cannot fix cadastral data without the landowner’s consent – sometimes, the only way forward is court.

  4. Recovering damages. In this case, the surveyor’s actions led to litigation costs, re-measurements, and potential personal liability.

Need help with land or real estate disputes?
📞 +370 664 42822 | 📧 info@prevence.legal

Project team
Andželika Buivydė
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Business trends and legal insights — all in one place.

Please wait...

Dėkojame! Sekmingai prisiregistravote

Let's talk

    Cookies

    This website uses essential and statistical cookies to ensure the attractive display of the Prevence website, maintain its functionality, and provide a smooth browsing experience.

    Essential cookies are a condition for using our website. If you choose to reject these types of cookies, we cannot guarantee the proper functioning of the website during your visit. You can manage the use of functional and third-party cookies by adjusting your browser settings.

    The legal basis for processing data collected through cookies is your consent. We do not link a visitor’s IP address or email address to data that would enable their identification. This means that each visitor’s session will be recorded, but visitors to the Prevence website will remain anonymous.

    When using a browser to access our content, you can configure your browser to accept all cookies, reject all cookies, or notify you when a cookie is sent. Each browser is different, so if you are unsure how to adjust your cookie settings, check the help menu of your browser. Your device’s operating system may also offer additional cookie controls. If you do not wish information to be collected through cookies, use the simple procedure available in most browsers that allows you to decline the use of cookies. To learn more about managing cookies, visit: http://www.allaboutcookies.org/manage-cookies/.


    Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(action-scheduler-en_US.mo) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/prence/:/tmp:/usr/share/pear) in /home/prence/domains/prevence.legal/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpml-string-translation/classes/MO/Hooks/LoadTranslationFile.php on line 82

    Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(action-scheduler-en_US.l10n.php) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/prence/:/tmp:/usr/share/pear) in /home/prence/domains/prevence.legal/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpml-string-translation/classes/MO/Hooks/LoadTranslationFile.php on line 85